By Dr. Bertha Dzifa Kumodji
BBA, MBA, Ph.D., MBAM, MIoL, ASSOC MAPM, MSHRM, MCIPD, FCIHRM, CMgr MCMI
HR & Recruitment, Workforce and Organisational Development, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHSFoundation Trust, Birmingham – UK
Researcher, Centre for Brexit Studies, Birmingham City University Business School, Birmingham – UK
In the intricate maze and labyrinth of Britain’s ever-evolving immigration landscape, a recent headline echoed through the nation like thunder: “Here you go, Asylum Seeker, Take £3,000 and go to Rwanda.” This blunt declaration serves as a poignant snapshot, capturing the collision of two monumental and seismic upheavals in the socio-political realm: Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic. As the tumult subsides and governmental policies take shape, the ramifications for Britain’s workforce and the pressing issue of talent shortages emerge with unmistakable clarity, compelling a meticulous scrutiny of the trajectory ahead for the UK’s labour market. From healthcare and technology to hospitality and agriculture, businesses grapple with the dual challenge of filling vacancies left by departing EU workers and addressing the skill gaps exacerbated by the pandemic’s disruptions.
The headline, while striking in its bluntness, underscores a broader, more complex narrative. At the heart of this discourse lies the confluence of immigration policies post-Brexit and the enduring ramifications of the global health crisis. The decision to leave the European Union ushered in a new era of sovereignty, characterised by a desire to reclaim control over borders and redefine Britain’s relationship with the world. Yet, this newfound autonomy has not come without its complexities, particularly in the realm of immigration. Simultaneously, the COVID-19 pandemic thrust the world into uncharted territory, precipitating unprecedented challenges for economies and societies alike. From widespread lockdowns to disruptions in global supply chains, the reverberations of the virus have been felt far and wide. In the realm of immigration, border closures and travel restrictions have reshaped the movement of people, exacerbating existing labour shortages and reshaping the demographic makeup of nations.
Against this backdrop, the directive to offer asylum seekers £3,000 to relocate to Rwanda underscores the tensions inherent in crafting immigration policies that balance humanitarian concerns with economic imperatives. This policy has sparked debate about the UK’s approach to asylum and immigration more broadly. While such initiatives may be framed as pragmatic solutions to alleviate pressure on domestic resources, safeguard and fortify national security, they also raise ethical questions regarding the treatment of vulnerable populations and the broader principles of inclusivity and solidarity. Critics decry them as a betrayal of Britain’s humanitarian obligations and a callous disregard for the plight of vulnerable individuals fleeing persecution and conflict.
One ripple effect that the government needs to consider is the profound impact on the asylum seekers themselves. For those fleeing persecution, violence, or other forms of harm, the prospect of being redirected to Rwanda may evoke a tumultuous mix of emotions, including uncertainty, fear, and hopelessness. Many asylum seekers undertake perilous journeys in search of safety and protection, driven by the desperate need for refuge from dire circumstances. How a country handles its obligations to protect those fleeing persecution can influence its standing in the global community and shape diplomatic relationships. Being offered financial incentives to leave the country may present a complex moral dilemma, forcing individuals to weigh immediate material assistance against long-term security and well-being.
While financial incentives may provide temporary relief for asylum seekers, they do little to address the root causes of their flight or the structural inequalities that perpetuate global patterns of displacement. The psychological toll on asylum seekers subjected to policies that prioritise deterrence over protection cannot be understated. Forced displacement and the uncertainty of asylum proceedings already inflict significant trauma on individuals who have endured persecution and violence. Policies that further marginalise and dehumanise asylum seekers only compound their suffering, perpetuating cycles of vulnerability and exclusion. Rather than resorting to such measures and solely focusing on reducing migrant numbers, a more humane and sustainable approach would involve creating pathways for asylum seekers and refugees to integrate into society and contribute positively to the labour market. By providing access to education, vocational training, and employment opportunities, the UK can empower these individuals to rebuild their lives and become productive members of society. Many asylum seekers bring with them a wealth of skills, talents, and experiences that can enrich the cultural and economic fabric of their host country.
Moreover, the ramifications extend beyond the immediate context of asylum seekers to encompass the broader dynamics of Britain’s labour market. Under the surface of this policy decision lies a deeper ethical and moral reckoning. The outsourcing of immigration management to countries like Rwanda raises troubling questions about the commodification of human lives and the erosion of international norms and standards. It also highlights the inherent tension between humanitarian imperatives and national interests as governments grapple with competing priorities in an increasingly interconnected world. As industries face the repercussions of talent shortages and skills disparities, the imperative for a strategic and forward-thinking approach to workforce planning intensifies. This necessity spans diverse sectors, encompassing the likes of healthcare, hospitality, and beyond, where organisations confront the formidable task of not only enticing but also retaining proficient professionals amidst an ever-evolving and fiercely competitive global milieu.
In charting the path forward, it is imperative to adopt a holistic perspective that recognises the interconnectedness of immigration policies, labour market dynamics, and broader socio-economic trends. This entails not only addressing immediate labour shortages but also investing in long-term strategies for talent development and retention. Initiatives such as upskilling programmes, apprenticeships, and targeted recruitment efforts can play a pivotal role in nurturing a resilient and adaptive workforce capable of meeting the evolving needs of the economy. Furthermore, fostering an environment of inclusivity and diversity is essential not only from a moral standpoint but also from a pragmatic perspective. Studies consistently demonstrate that diverse teams are more innovative, productive, and resilient, making them invaluable assets in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.
At its essence, the discourse surrounding immigration policy in post-Brexit and COVID-19 Britain transcends mere numerical management or the alleviation of purported pressures on public services. Rather, it serves as a profound exploration into the very essence of the nation’s identity and the values it holds dear within an ever more interconnected and interdependent global landscape. It prompts introspection about what it means to be British in the 21st century, navigating a globalised world where borders are permeable, cultures intermingle, and identities are fluid. Embracing a comprehensive perspective that places emphasis on the attraction, retention, and nurturing of talent, the United Kingdom has the opportunity to carve out a prominent position as a beacon of innovation, entrepreneurship, and diversity on the world stage. In this narrative, immigration isn’t a zero-sum game where winners and losers are determined solely by quotas and restrictions. It’s an opportunity for mutual enrichment—for individuals to contribute their skills, perspectives, and experiences to the collective tapestry of British society while also finding a place where they can thrive and fulfil their potential. By adopting such an approach, Britain can not only address immediate policy concerns but also assert its enduring commitment to openness, progress, and inclusivity in an era defined by unprecedented global exchange and collaboration.
In conclusion, the UK’s path forward lies in recognising the value of every individual who contributes to its society and economy. This requires not just surface-level recognition but a profound appreciation for the diverse contributions of individuals from all walks of life. Mapping the path forward for the UK’s labour market requires a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between immigration policies, economic dynamics, and social factors. Migration is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that cannot be addressed through unilateral measures or short-term fixes. It requires a comprehensive approach that addresses root causes, promotes human rights and dignity, and fosters international cooperation and solidarity. Central to any effective strategy lies a commitment to upholding the fundamental rights and dignity of migrants. This means safeguarding their access to essential services, protecting them from exploitation and discrimination, and ensuring their voices are heard in decision-making processes. Instead of resorting to short-term fixes or divisive rhetoric, communities, businesses, civil society organisations, and policymakers must engage in constructive dialogue with stakeholders across sectors to develop inclusive and sustainable strategies that harness the full potential of Britain’s diverse workforce.
The true measure of a nation’s prosperity lies not in its ability to shut its doors to the outside world but in its capacity to embrace change, adapt to new realities, and leverage the talents and contributions of all who call it home. Ultimately, the challenge before Britain is not merely one of navigating the intricacies of policy formulation but of charting a course that upholds the values of compassion, equity, and opportunity for all. By embracing diversity, investing in talent development, and forging partnerships that transcend borders, it can build a labour market that is not only robust and competitive but also inclusive and sustainable for generations to come.
In this crucible of uncertainty, the choices Britain makes today will shape the trajectory of tomorrow. But this vision requires more than just policy prescriptions; it demands a cultural shift—a reimagining of Britain as a nation that embraces diversity as a source of strength, not division. It calls for leadership that is visionary, courageous, empathetic, and pragmatic, capable of steering the country towards a future where inclusivity is not just an aspiration but a lived reality. For in the richness of Britain’s diversity lies the promise of a brighter tomorrow, where every individual has the opportunity to flourish and contribute to the tapestry of its shared humanity, regardless of their nationality or immigration status.
REFERENCES
• https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68932830
• https://www.ft.com/content/f2a5b655-0064-4bd3-b91b-d7055d680dde
• https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68918250
• https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tories-defend-giving-man-3000-32710605
Centre for Brexit Studies Blog 